Did you agree if your rights are violated, then the villain give apology and youjust accept it peacefully?
I think I won’t just let it goes like that and “peace was never an option”. (Just lookat the fiery anger in that chicken’s eyes!) I have several reasons that I’ll explainthemin the following.
First, if we claim that we have freedom, we must fight to achieve it. Violationagainst our rights is the same as violation against our freedom. “We must tatakae, tatakae, tatakae! ... (fight)”, like Eren or the Attack Titan said. Don’t be like Arminwho thinks that talk is enough to settle things down. Especially, don’t try it whenwehave lower position or doesn’t have an ace under our sleeve in negotiation or thepeace talk. If we are doing it, maybe we would ended up like Indonesian who lost more than 50% of their territory against Netherland, including their capital city, in1950s!
Second, peace talk is often useless. It’s not effective enough if the villain is sostubborn. Imagine if you have preached him/her for ten times, yet he/she never takes care about your complains. Or maybe, he/she just pleased you at the first time by saying “yes”, but do nothing afterwards. I would say that it’s just like UNsaid to Israeli Zionists to stop oppression against Palestinian or CCP to stop discriminating Uyghur ethnic. Or if you want recent example, it’s just like ASEAN’semergency meeting in Thailand that initiated by Indonesia and other countries whowant to make a meeting between Tatmadaw (military government) and civiliangovernment of Myanmar. Even the people of Myanmar want other nations to meddle in their problem as I read in the comments of news in Youtube.
NB: I personally don’t like conflict. This writing is just about me trying to give another perspective of my mind.
Komentar
Posting Komentar