Langsung ke konten utama

Peace was Never an Option

Peace was Never an Option 


Did you agree if your rights are violated, then the villain give apology and youjust accept it peacefully? 

I think I won’t just let it goes like that and “peace was never an option”. (Just lookat the fiery anger in that chicken’s eyes!) I have several reasons that I’ll explainthemin the following. 

First, if we claim that we have freedom, we must fight to achieve it. Violationagainst our rights is the same as violation against our freedom. “We must tatakae, tatakae, tatakae! ... (fight)”, like Eren or the Attack Titan said. Don’t be like Arminwho thinks that talk is enough to settle things down. Especially, don’t try it whenwehave lower position or doesn’t have an ace under our sleeve in negotiation or thepeace talk. If we are doing it, maybe we would ended up like Indonesian who lost more than 50% of their territory against Netherland, including their capital city, in1950s! 

Second, peace talk is often useless. It’s not effective enough if the villain is sostubborn. Imagine if you have preached him/her for ten times, yet he/she never takes care about your complains. Or maybe, he/she just pleased you at the first time by saying “yes”, but do nothing afterwards. I would say that it’s just like UNsaid to Israeli Zionists to stop oppression against Palestinian or CCP to stop discriminating Uyghur ethnic. Or if you want recent example, it’s just like ASEAN’semergency meeting in Thailand that initiated by Indonesia and other countries whowant to make a meeting between Tatmadaw (military government) and civiliangovernment of Myanmar. Even the people of Myanmar want other nations to meddle in their problem as I read in the comments of news in Youtube. 

NB: I personally don’t like conflict. This writing is just about me trying to give another perspective of my mind.


Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Ringkasan Pengantar Kosmologi - Bab 10: Inflasi Dan Alam Semesta Sangat Dini

RINGKASAN PENGANTAR KOSMOLOGI BAB 10: INFLASI DAN ALAM SEMESTA SANGAT DINI Kosmologi adalah studi tentang alam semesta secara keseluruhan. Di dalamnya, kita mempelajari hal-hal seperti, “Kapan alam semesta bermula?”, “Kapan alam semesta berakhir?”, “Bagaimana bentuk alam semesta ini?”, dan lain-lain. Saya akan membagikan ringkasan materi dari Buku “Introduction to Cosmology (Second Edition)” oleh Prof. Barbara Ryden (2016) dan sedikit catatan perkuliahan dari Pengantar Kosmologi (AS 3201). Apabila terdapat kesalahan dan tambahan, hubungi email fikri666mfan@gmail.com. Berikut adalah daftar materi Pengantar Kosmologi Bab 1: Pendahuluan Bab 2: Newton vs Einstein Bab 3: Dinamika Kosmik Bab 4: Alam Semesta Komponen Tunggal Bab 5: Alam Semesta Banyak-Komponen Bab 6: Mengukur Parameter Kosmologi Bab 7: Materi Gelap Bab 8: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Bab 9: Nukleosintesis Dan Alam Semesta Dini Bab 10: Inflasi Dan Alam Semesta Sangat Dini Bab 11: Pembentukan Stru...

Ringkasan Pengantar Kosmologi - Bab 3: Dinamika Kosmik

RINGKASAN PENGANTAR KOSMOLOGI BAB 3: DINAMIKA KOSMIK Kosmologi adalah studi tentang alam semesta secara keseluruhan. Di dalamnya, kita mempelajari hal-hal seperti, “Kapan alam semesta bermula?”, “Kapan alam semesta berakhir?”, “Bagaimana bentuk alam semesta ini?”, dan lain-lain. Saya akan membagikan ringkasan materi dari Buku “Introduction to Cosmology (Second Edition)” oleh Prof. Barbara Ryden (2016) dan sedikit catatan perkuliahan dari Pengantar Kosmologi (AS 3201). Apabila terdapat kesalahan dan tambahan, hubungi email fikri666mfan@gmail.com. Berikut adalah daftar materi Pengantar Kosmologi Bab 1: Pendahuluan Bab 2: Newton vs Einstein Bab 3: Dinamika Kosmik Bab 4: Alam Semesta Komponen Tunggal Bab 5: Alam Semesta Banyak-Komponen Bab 6: Mengukur Parameter Kosmologi Bab 7: Materi Gelap Bab 8: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Bab 9: Nukleosintesis Dan Alam Semesta Dini Bab 10: Inflasi Dan Alam Semesta Sangat Dini Bab 11: Pembentukan Struktur Skala Besar: Ket...

Traditional vs Online Encyclopedia

 Traditional vs Online Encyclopedia The article tells us about how traditional encyclopedia is more superior than online communal encyclopedia. The author stated several problems that online encyclopedia faced and the lecturer countered those arguments. Here’s the summary of that debate. First, the author stated that online encyclopedia lacks credibility because it doesn’t say anything about its content writers’s background. Everybody can contribute to that encyclopedia. Meanwhile at traditional encyclopedia, only professionals do that job. But the lecturer argued that every encyclopedia never has been 100% accurate, even if the writers are professionals. Besides, online encyclopedia credibility can be improved with easier correction that the traditional one lacks. Second, online encyclopedia is more prone to be hijacked because of its openness. It wouldn’t happen in a traditional one because it has its publisher team. But, the improvement can be applied in online encyclopedia if i...