Langsung ke konten utama

Why Does Face-to-Face Communication Feel Better?

 Why Does Face-to-Face Communication Feel Better?



Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls.


I believe that face to face communication is still a top mode of communication. I have several reasons that are viewed from different perspectives. I will explain them in the following.


First, talking can deliver messages faster than typing. Although our mind can be translated into words more accurate with typing, it lacks interactivity. Imagine if we want to interview somebody. We ask our guests, but they are too slow to respond back because they want their answer more appropriate. Even if they give us the answer, maybe we want to clarify a bit of information that they’d delivered, so we ask again with small questions. They’ll give us the clarification, but of course it’ll take  a lot of time.


Second, it contains subtle communication that other modes of communication probably can’t afford. The emotions are something that they are lacking. By having face to face affairs, we can read people’s emotions by looking at their facial expression. We can understand how their mood is when they are talking. Furthermore, sometimes, we can read something deeper under their facade.


Third, I think that it is just natural that we are more convenient when talking face to face. Perhaps this is the trait from our ancestor back then when they were still surviving in the wild. Letters and words haven’t been discovered yet at that time. So, it is simply the reason that we feel that face-to-face communication is better.


Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Ringkasan Pengantar Kosmologi - Bab 10: Inflasi Dan Alam Semesta Sangat Dini

RINGKASAN PENGANTAR KOSMOLOGI BAB 10: INFLASI DAN ALAM SEMESTA SANGAT DINI Kosmologi adalah studi tentang alam semesta secara keseluruhan. Di dalamnya, kita mempelajari hal-hal seperti, “Kapan alam semesta bermula?”, “Kapan alam semesta berakhir?”, “Bagaimana bentuk alam semesta ini?”, dan lain-lain. Saya akan membagikan ringkasan materi dari Buku “Introduction to Cosmology (Second Edition)” oleh Prof. Barbara Ryden (2016) dan sedikit catatan perkuliahan dari Pengantar Kosmologi (AS 3201). Apabila terdapat kesalahan dan tambahan, hubungi email fikri666mfan@gmail.com. Berikut adalah daftar materi Pengantar Kosmologi Bab 1: Pendahuluan Bab 2: Newton vs Einstein Bab 3: Dinamika Kosmik Bab 4: Alam Semesta Komponen Tunggal Bab 5: Alam Semesta Banyak-Komponen Bab 6: Mengukur Parameter Kosmologi Bab 7: Materi Gelap Bab 8: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Bab 9: Nukleosintesis Dan Alam Semesta Dini Bab 10: Inflasi Dan Alam Semesta Sangat Dini Bab 11: Pembentukan Stru...

Ringkasan Pengantar Kosmologi - Bab 3: Dinamika Kosmik

RINGKASAN PENGANTAR KOSMOLOGI BAB 3: DINAMIKA KOSMIK Kosmologi adalah studi tentang alam semesta secara keseluruhan. Di dalamnya, kita mempelajari hal-hal seperti, “Kapan alam semesta bermula?”, “Kapan alam semesta berakhir?”, “Bagaimana bentuk alam semesta ini?”, dan lain-lain. Saya akan membagikan ringkasan materi dari Buku “Introduction to Cosmology (Second Edition)” oleh Prof. Barbara Ryden (2016) dan sedikit catatan perkuliahan dari Pengantar Kosmologi (AS 3201). Apabila terdapat kesalahan dan tambahan, hubungi email fikri666mfan@gmail.com. Berikut adalah daftar materi Pengantar Kosmologi Bab 1: Pendahuluan Bab 2: Newton vs Einstein Bab 3: Dinamika Kosmik Bab 4: Alam Semesta Komponen Tunggal Bab 5: Alam Semesta Banyak-Komponen Bab 6: Mengukur Parameter Kosmologi Bab 7: Materi Gelap Bab 8: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Bab 9: Nukleosintesis Dan Alam Semesta Dini Bab 10: Inflasi Dan Alam Semesta Sangat Dini Bab 11: Pembentukan Struktur Skala Besar: Ket...

Traditional vs Online Encyclopedia

 Traditional vs Online Encyclopedia The article tells us about how traditional encyclopedia is more superior than online communal encyclopedia. The author stated several problems that online encyclopedia faced and the lecturer countered those arguments. Here’s the summary of that debate. First, the author stated that online encyclopedia lacks credibility because it doesn’t say anything about its content writers’s background. Everybody can contribute to that encyclopedia. Meanwhile at traditional encyclopedia, only professionals do that job. But the lecturer argued that every encyclopedia never has been 100% accurate, even if the writers are professionals. Besides, online encyclopedia credibility can be improved with easier correction that the traditional one lacks. Second, online encyclopedia is more prone to be hijacked because of its openness. It wouldn’t happen in a traditional one because it has its publisher team. But, the improvement can be applied in online encyclopedia if i...